My Birthday today. I've had so many that is usn't worth mentioning, but my wife got me a card with a message that I felt should be passed on:
SENIOR BIRTHDAY PRAYER:
God grant me the senility to forget the people I never liked anyway, the good fortune to run into the ones I do . . . and the eyesight to tell the difference!
I thought it great!
I'd also like to talk about specious reasoning.
Rocketdave commented recently (not critically) about the specious reasoning that I had some of my dommes use in my stories. I took a stab at answering his comment, but I kept thinking about it and came up with a little more.
As I've admitted before, I'm into a male being humiliated by a female - and the more humiliation, the better. Now, let's suppose that a wife can convince her husband that black is white - and admit that she's right? That's kinda silly - but she is exacting a form of dominance over the poor husband - is that not correct?
Take a man being physically forced into going over his wife's knees - then spanked soundly. That is a 'physical' domination. But suppose, she talks him into admitting that he deserves to be spanked - and that it is all for his own good? That's 'mental' domination. Now, while he's been spanked, suppose that he smiles, kicks his legs and lets out delighted little squeals as well? I think that our poor little sissy has been dominated properly.
Another piece of idiotic reasoning I enjoyed using. The wife has 'discovered' some sissyish tendencies in her husband - but says that she wants him to be a REAL man! Wants him to perform in some 'masculine' manner - that she defines. The poor dear cannot 'quite' perform as she wants. To help him - she has him start to wear some feminine article - but suppose he still can't meet her expectations? Maybe something MORE feminine will help him arouse his male beast?
But now just supose that this works. Makes the poor thing rebel? THEN? It's obvious that he's reverting to some old masculine trait - and this will never do! He'll obviously need to dress or act more like a wee girl to get him 'balanced'! Into a skirt - or a pair of panties! There is absolutely no way of winning for the poor bugger
It's just another instance of a male accepting an obviously-flawed piece of reasoning. By doing this, he is admitting subservience. Lot's of FUN!
So the poor bugger is damned if he does - and damned if he doesn't.
But that's my thoughts for the day.
Bea
.
SENIOR BIRTHDAY PRAYER:
God grant me the senility to forget the people I never liked anyway, the good fortune to run into the ones I do . . . and the eyesight to tell the difference!
I thought it great!
I'd also like to talk about specious reasoning.
Rocketdave commented recently (not critically) about the specious reasoning that I had some of my dommes use in my stories. I took a stab at answering his comment, but I kept thinking about it and came up with a little more.
As I've admitted before, I'm into a male being humiliated by a female - and the more humiliation, the better. Now, let's suppose that a wife can convince her husband that black is white - and admit that she's right? That's kinda silly - but she is exacting a form of dominance over the poor husband - is that not correct?
Take a man being physically forced into going over his wife's knees - then spanked soundly. That is a 'physical' domination. But suppose, she talks him into admitting that he deserves to be spanked - and that it is all for his own good? That's 'mental' domination. Now, while he's been spanked, suppose that he smiles, kicks his legs and lets out delighted little squeals as well? I think that our poor little sissy has been dominated properly.
Another piece of idiotic reasoning I enjoyed using. The wife has 'discovered' some sissyish tendencies in her husband - but says that she wants him to be a REAL man! Wants him to perform in some 'masculine' manner - that she defines. The poor dear cannot 'quite' perform as she wants. To help him - she has him start to wear some feminine article - but suppose he still can't meet her expectations? Maybe something MORE feminine will help him arouse his male beast?
But now just supose that this works. Makes the poor thing rebel? THEN? It's obvious that he's reverting to some old masculine trait - and this will never do! He'll obviously need to dress or act more like a wee girl to get him 'balanced'! Into a skirt - or a pair of panties! There is absolutely no way of winning for the poor bugger
It's just another instance of a male accepting an obviously-flawed piece of reasoning. By doing this, he is admitting subservience. Lot's of FUN!
So the poor bugger is damned if he does - and damned if he doesn't.
But that's my thoughts for the day.
Bea
.